Author Topic: Is "antivaxx" an appropriate term for those that took a wait & see approach?  (Read 210 times)

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3081
Is "antivaxxer" an appropriate term to apply to pragmatists, that bothered to investigate and calculate their personal risk VS benefit profiles (particularly in light of near 100% effective $20 home treatment protocols) and as a result decided to take a wait-and-see approach, before volunteering to be test subjects in the trial of a questionable corporation - investigational, experimental, genetically engineered, chemically enhanced, innate immune response reprogramming, leaky, escape mutant training, gene therapy, the longer term consequences of which only God can know?

Particularly considering that all prior trials of experimental mRNA vaccines against SARS corona viruses in humans, failed during the animal testing phase due to vaccine enhanced disease/pathogenic priming.
Most don't realize that the FDA still unto this day (9-6-23) warns about vaccine enhanced disease. Did the practitioner that administered your jab fully inform you of that?
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=652.0




Regarding the ridiculous label of "vaccine hesitant", would it be appropriate to label someone that chooses not to jump out of an airplane as "sky-diving hesitant"? Or someone that chooses not to bungee jump, as being "bungee jumping hesitant"?
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=1039.0
« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 08:52:00 AM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/