COVID-19 Forum, Information, Studies, Treatments
COVID-19 Coronavirus => Doctors on 99+% Effective Treatments for COVID-19, With World Renowned $20 Remedies => Topic started by: admin on December 05, 2020, 07:04:37 AM
-
Since HCQ+Zn+AZ has consistently been shown to be 99-100% effective in the early outpatient setting, and Ivermectin also effective even in later settings, if a doctor refuses to prescribe these life saving drugs upon a patient's request and the patient dies, wouldn't that constitute grounds for a wrongful death or medical malpractice lawsuit by their survivors?
Would it be medical malpractice for him not to prescribe anything, or defer to over-the-counter remedies, when in fact viruses - and particularly COVID-19 - need to be treated early and aggressively?
Even the instructions on Tamiflu say it must be taken within 2 days of the presentation of symptoms.
Can doctors be sued for patients they have already lost since information about the fantastic success of HCQ+Zn+AZ has been out there since March (even February) and Ivermectin since April?
Should doctors be more concerned about lawsuits being brought against them for not having prescribed hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin while having done little to nothing instead?
Particularly when a world renowned virologist like Didier Raoult declared back in February of 2020 "Actually, from all respiratory infections it’s probably the easiest to treat".
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=318.0
Failure to prescribe HCQ+AZ "should be grounds for malpractice." - Didier Raoult
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=211.0