"WHO says not to use ivermectin on COVID-19 patients" - What "reason" given?

[admin]

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-03-ivermectin-covid-patients.html

"WHO says not to use ivermectin on COVID-19 patients"

"The World Health Organization said Wednesday that ivermectin—touted by some on social media as a COVID-19 "miracle cure"—should not be used to treat coronavirus patients.

In response to the swirl of claims around the cheap anti-parasite drug, the WHO issued guidelines saying ivermectin should only be used on COVID-19 patients in clinical trial settings.

The UN health agency said there was a "very low certainty of evidence" on ivermectin's effects on mortality, hospital admission and getting rid of the virus from the body."

"'Ongoing concerns'

The WHO looked at studies that compared ivermectin against a placebo and against other drugs, in 16 randomised control trials examining 2,400 patients.

"We currently lack persuasive evidence of a mechanism of action for ivermectin in COVID-19, and any observed clinical benefit would be unexplained," it said."
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-03-ivermectin-covid-patients.html
____________________________________________

That would seem to suggest that if we can't explain why dedicated clinicians have been enjoying their stunning up to 100% effective results curing COVID-19 patients with ivermectin for almost a year now, that it's time to recommend against this life-saving drug and let COVID-19 patients progress without early treatment until they turn blue and then get admitted to and die in hospitals by drowning in their own body fluids without life-saving intervention.

[edit add 4-17: By October of 2020 Dr. Brian Tyson had treated over 1900 elderly and high-risk patients with a multi-drug therapy that included hydroxychloroquine, with 0 deaths and only one hospitalization of 4 days. In a video I saw today, by mid-March of 2021 his team had treated over 5,000 COVID patients with the same kind of results. Is that not a sufficient enough demonstration that it works? Well not for the perpetrators of the 3rd largest genocide in world history.  https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=15.0

So is the WHO too stupid to see this. Based on their COVID history including (intentionally overdosing?) lethal HCQ "trials", I guess that's not a stretch, but is it even more likely they are just more bureaucratic shills for Big Pharma and the Illness Industry? https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=359.0
By April the The Dr.'s Rajtier enjoyed similar success with ivermectin https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=571.0 end edit]

"• 100% of the 49 studies to date report positive effects (24 statistically significant in isolation)."
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=458.0

So why would the WHO come out against this 35-year demonstrated safe, cheap, COVID-19 life-saving drug, that has had billions of does prescribed for hundreds of millions of people over the last 35 years? Particularly in light of the WHO's own suggestion: "Mass treatment with ivermectin: an underutilized public health strategy".
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=540.0

Like they mass treated in Peru for example and at least one Mexican state:
https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/#ivermectin

So doing nothing, or administering things of little to no effect like Remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies, and simply letting patients die of COVID-19, is the WHO's new preferred strategy when it comes to treating COVID-19?

I have to wonder if their most important motivation behind continuing such nonsensical slaughter of COVID-19 patients, could be because once the WHO, NIH, FDA and CDC are forced to own up to the fact that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin have been healing up to 100% of even elderly and high-risk patients from COVID-19 ever since March of 2020, they will simultaneously be recognized as having perpetrated the third largest genocide in world history. Just as culpable have been the censors and destroyers of truth at Google, Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, Next Door and print and TV media, so don't expect them to report on their error until they are forced to.

It's high time for Nuremberg style trials for crimes against humanity beginning with higher ups in Big Pharma and Big Tech.

[admin]

"The WHO’s Denial of Ivermectin: Big Science, Disinformation and their Impacts on Human Rights

FLCCC Weekly Update (April 21, 2021): Dr. Pierre Kory speaks on “The WHO’s Denial of Ivermectin: Big Science, Disinformation and their Impacts on Human Rights.

“The WHO is completely compromised,” says Dr. Kory. “They are protecting other interests.”

The scale of the markets (think vaccines and pharmaceutical companies) that would be affected by the approval of ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 is massive. Meanwhile, because the WHO failed to recommend ivermectin for worldwide use, hundreds of thousands of the world’s most vulnerable people are now on the way to their deaths."
https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/the-whos-denial-of-ivermectin/

[admin]

Conflict of Interest in WHO Recommendation Against Ivermectin
https://trialsitenews.com/conflict-of-interest-in-who-recommendation-against-ivermectin/

Is there a Problem with the Lopez-Medina, Colombia-based Study Implicating Ivermectin? Major Pharma Companies Including Merck Funding the Trial Site during the Study
https://trialsitenews.com/is-there-a-problem-with-the-lopez-medina-colombia-based-study-implicating-ivermectin-major-pharma-companies-including-merck-funding-the-trial-site-during-the-study/