Author Topic: This forum section regards THE applied SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment  (Read 1173 times)

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
This forum section regards the actual science behind COVID treatment and recovery through world leading epidemiologists, virologists, microbiologists, immunologists and vaccinologists and as proven through the scientific method, over two years of evidence-based practice of the art of medicine, by experienced, competent, compassionate, highly knowledgeable and talented front line treating physicians.

"Definition of science
1a : knowledge or a system of knowledge covering general truths or the operation of general laws especially as obtained and tested through scientific method"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/science

"Definition of scientific method: principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses"
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/scientific%20method
_______________________________________________

In other words, we won't find science in designed-to-fail "trials" for COVID treatment that include one or two drugs and/or nutraceuticals, when 99+% successful competent clinicians generally use from 5 and even up to 10 or 15 different drugs and nutraceuticals in combination, at different times during the course of treatment, for a disease that manifests in 3 stages each of which requires different approaches and combinations of therapeutics.

Comparing studies VS 99+% success rates in evidenced-based medical practice

Indeed to expose "trial" participants to disability and death through built-in negligence, when two years of evidence-based medicine has proven they would have otherwise stood a 99+% chance of survival with proper treatment, is not only unethical but tantamount to homicide.

Why does Fauci insist on randomized placebo-controlled study for HCQ?

Covid-19 Has Turned Public Health Into a Lethal, Patient-Killing Experimental Endeavor

What Big Pharma and the government tried to pawn off as science such as Pfizer's vaccine trials would hardly seem so when, according to Robert Kennedy Jr., over the brief six-month trial period only two people in the placebo group numbering approximately 22,000 and only one in the similarly sized vaccine group died from COVID. Which it would seem could have just as easily been the result of an acute vitamin D deficiency in that single extra death out of 22,000 individuals. Let alone that there was even a 42.8% greater all-cause mortality in Pfizer's vaccine group than the unvaccinated placebo control group.
Which would seem to explain and be consistent with, the skyrocketing all-cause mortality in the year of "vaccine" rollout.

All-cause mortality skyrockets in 2021 Data from Europe and the U.S. show

Life insurance CEO says deaths are up 40% among people ages 18-64

Fifth-largest U.S. life insurer reports 163% rise in 2021 death-benefit payouts for working age clients

Even worse, after just 6 months the vaccine profiteers vaccinated their "control" groups, eliminating the possibility of ever being able to compare the longer term side effects, of their investigational, experimental, leaky, "vaccines".

At least eliminating the control group would have been the case if it weren't for the natural control group of all the unvaxxed - that our Big Pharma owned government seems to be obsessed with force-jabbing in its entirety. Could the reason be so that there would be no evidence of healthy immune systems left, to serve as witness against the short and particularly long-term harmful side effects of the toxic jabs? There is good reason that vaccines traditionally require at least 10 years worth of testing and trials before becoming widely accepted. Indeed the FDA's own rules call for a minimum of 2 years, while these toxic COVID jabs were allowed to be pushed after only months.

Fauci on vaxx: "...you find out it takes 12 years for all hell to break loose.."

All the while in actual science, through the art of the practice of medicine, dedicated competent clinicians have enjoyed 99+% success rates in early treatment of elderly and high-risk individuals ever since spring of 2020 when Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, announced on March 23rd of 2020 that he had treated 500 elderly and high-risk patients, with 0 deaths, 0 intubations and 0 hospitalizations, through what became known as the "Zelenko Protocol".

Others like those affiliated with myfreedoctor.com treated over 150,000 individuals for COVID, with only 4 fatalities, resulting in a 99.99% success rate.
It's important to note that if everyone in the U.S. from the beginning of the pandemic had been encouraged to seek early treatment for COVID through public service announcements, at the rate of success of MyFreeDoctor.com our total mortality throughout 2 years of the pandemic would have theoretically been just 27 instead of 1,000,000. Even at the well below the typical success rate of 99%, of physicians that treat early with multi-drug/nutraceutical protocols, total mortality could have been 10,000 instead of 1,000,000, or just 5,000 per year.

They join other competent clinicians posted in this forum section that have enjoyed 99+% success rates like Dr. Brian Tyson who has treated over 5,000 mostly elderly and high-risk patients, with 0 deaths among those that showed up for treatment on a timely basis.
Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients

Then there are Dr Jean Jacques Rajter and his wife Dr. Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter who were early pioneers in the repurposing of Ivermectin for the highly effective treatment of COVID-19 beginning in April of 2020.

A more recent example is the state of Uttar Pradesh India with a population of 230 million, that went from a catastrophic 310,783 COVID cases to 11 in just a few months, with no deaths, being rendered essentially COVID free through a door-to-door rapid test and treat program employing ivermectin in a multi-drug/nutraceutical therapy.

That's science!

Which is certainly more than enough, but we also have 151 ivermectin COVID studies, 103 peer reviewed, 81 comparing treatment &control as well as 394 HCQ COVID-19 studies, 297 peer reviewed, 326 comparing treatment and control, that show very positive results in spite of how insufficient every such trial for treatment of such a complex illness must necessarily be.
Comparing studies VS 99+% success rates in evidenced-based medical practice

Compare the actual science of healing patients, with Fauci's anti-science.
Fauci's demands for randomized placebo controlled trials
, for generic drugs that have been proven safe for many decades - that have proven themselves to be 99+% effective against COVID-19 ever since March of 2020 - constitutes nothing short of a demand for homicide of those in the control group, which if composed of elderly and high-risk patients would suffer a 5-10% mortality rate - even if the control arm was treated by the NIH "standard of care" instead of a placebo.
Fauci's phony "gold standard" demand, would have in actuality been tantamount to Joseph Mengele style Nazi experimentation, just as the negligent and toxic NIH "standard of care" resulted in the vast majority of 1,000,000 dead Americans.
NIH deadly recommendations compared to those of COVID-competent professionals

Fauci demanding trials of the safe generic drug hydroxychloroquine that the NIH had established back in 2005 showed great promise in both prevention and treatment of SARS corona viruses. A drug that is taken by millions of Americans every day of the year decade after decade, for Lupus and arthritis, in the same dosage that COVID protocols prescribe over just 7 days.
DEADLY COVER UP: Fauci knew about HCQ in 2005 - nobody needed to die

But he killed thousands of AIDS sufferers back in 1987 with the same unreasonable demand.
Fauci killed thousands of AIDS sufferers by making the same ridiculous demand back in 1987.

How many elderly and high-risk patients would volunteer to be in a blind trial, if they were told in advance that in one arm they would stand a 99.9% chance of survival, while in the other arm suffer a 5-10% mortality rate?
Why does Fauci insist on an unethical, immoral placebo-controlled study for HCQ?

Movie "Doctor's Orders" https://rumble.com/embed/vnxmww/?pub=4

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3600702/
"The ethics of clinical research requires equipoise--a state of genuine uncertainty on the part of the clinical investigator regarding the comparative therapeutic merits of each arm in a trial. Should the investigator discover that one treatment is of superior therapeutic merit, he or she is ethically obliged to offer that treatment."

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12189059/
"The leading ethical position on placebo-controlled clinical trials is that whenever proven effective treatment exists for a given condition, it is unethical to test a new treatment for that condition against placebo. Invoking the principle of clinical equipoise, opponents of placebo-controlled trials in the face of proven effective treatment argue that they (1) violate the therapeutic obligation of physicians to offer optimal medical care and (2) lack both scientific and clinical merit. We contend that both of these arguments are mistaken. Clinical equipoise provides erroneous ethical guidance in the case of placebo-controlled trials, because it ignores the ethically relevant distinction between clinical trials and treatment in the context of clinical medicine and the methodological limitations of active-controlled trials. Placebo controls are ethically justifiable when they are supported by sound methodological considerations and their use does not expose research participants to excessive risks of harm."
« Last Edit: May 28, 2023, 08:49:44 AM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
https://c19ivermectin.com/tyson.html

13 January 2022 - Early treatment study
Low Rates of Hospitalization and Death in 4,376 COVID-19 Patients Given Early Ambulatory Medical and Supportive Care. A Case Series and Observational Study.

Retrospective 4,376 patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 in the USA treated with multiple medications including HCQ/ivermectin, favipiravir, vitamin C, D, quercetin, zinc, mAbs, budesonide, dexamethasone, prednisone, and colchicine (exact treatments specific to each patient), showing significantly lower hospitalization and mortality compared to the surrounding community.

risk of death, 99.8% lower, RR 0.002, p < 0.001, treatment 0 of 3,962 (0.0%), control 471 of 20,921 (2.3%), NNT 44, relative risk is not 0 because of continuity correction due to zero events (with reciprocal of the contrasting arm), All AVUC mild patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).

risk of hospitalization, 99.8% lower, RR 0.002, p < 0.001, treatment 2 of 3,962 (0.1%), control 4,343 of 20,921 (20.8%), NNT 4.8, All AVUC mild patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).

risk of death, 97.0% lower, RR 0.03, p < 0.001, treatment 3 of 4,375 (0.1%), control 471 of 20,921 (2.3%), NNT 46, All AVUC patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).

risk of hospitalization, 99.0% lower, RR 0.010, p < 0.001, treatment 9 of 4,375 (0.2%), control 4,343 of 20,921 (20.8%), NNT 4.9, All AVUC patients vs. Imperial County (corrected).

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-first-tysonfareed-study-text

https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-first-tysonfareed-study-text?s=r

« Last Edit: April 17, 2022, 03:03:10 PM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
The science of treatment for COVID-19 evolved roughly like this.

In February of 2020 French microbiologist Dr. Didier Raoult was met with good success in treating COVID-19 with hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=253.0

Dr. Vladimir Zelenko in New York noticed Didier's success and was also aware of work the South Koreans were doing with zinc. So he combined the two treatments to formulate his triple therapy of hydroxychloroquine+zinc+azithromycin, and met with 100% success in treatment of his first 500 elderly and high-risk patients with it, after which it became known as the "Zelenko Protocol".
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=1007.0

Dr. Brian Tyson learned about the Zelenko Protocol, tweaked the dosage a little, and along with his colleague Dr. George Fareed have treated over 7,000 patients, with 100% success in their elderly and high-risk patients, with 0 deaths among those that sought treatment on a timely basis.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=1369.0

That was mostly related to early outpatient treatment with HCQ which is pretty much just antiviral. As was observed by hospital based treating physicians like board certified ICU pulmonary care specialist Dr. Pierre Kory who noticed that as the disease progressed past the stage of viral replication, the body passed into an inflammatory stage or cytokine storm. So he theorized and discovered that corticosteroids were effective in reducing inflammation in this stage, but it was many months and tens of thousands more completely unnecessary deaths of innocent Americans, before the homicidal heads of our government health agencies would acknowledge that simple demonstrated fact. Eventually they were compelled to make it part of NIH guidelines, but only after those tens of thousands of additional completely unavoidable deaths. The NIH recommendations are still insufficient in regard to dosage, so hospitalized patients continue to die unnecessarily.

So some of these modalities are stage-specific. For example if corticosteroids are given too early they work against the body's own immune system. This is the kind of individualized care required, that renders designed-to-fail "trials" that showcase just one of two elements, so totally absurd - and homicidal!

Also noticed is that the body eventually goes into thrombosis with clotting and thickening or agglutination of the blood, requiring blood thinners, which can be accomplished with simple aspirin for milder or preventative blood thinning in earlier stages.

Then in April of 2020, Dr. Juliana Cepelowicz Rajter had remembered that ivermectin had been used in successful treatment of Zika virus, along with a recent very positive in vitro study, and so along with her husband Dr Jean Jacques Rajter, tried it on a patient that was near death that the patient's son's urging, with miraculous success. They immediately administered it to their most critical patients with wild success which they detailed in scientific papers. Thus was born the triple therapy of ivermectin+zinc+doxycycline.
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=571.0

Either one of the triple therapies are virtually 100% effective against COVID even in elderly and high-risk patients, if treated preferably within the first two or three days of the onset of symptoms and up to 5 days and even a little more for hydroxychloroquine, and throughout all stages of COVID-19 for ivermectin because it has anti-inflammatory properties in addition to its anti-viral properties.

Then particularly over the first year and in the following years physician/scientists have reported on their successes, with doctors that can see through the fog of Big Tech and Big Government censorship, adjusting and embellishing toward ever-greater success in COVID treatment. In spite of the legacy media attempt at complete blackout of these most eminently qualified and successful physicians, while 900,000 Americans and millions more worldwide died horrific and completely unnecessary deaths. Sacrificed on the alter of Big Pharma, Big Government, bureaucrat and legacy media profits. The illustration in the prior post is state of the art treatment that had been developed by mid-summer or fall of 2020. That program is sometimes referred to as the "McCullough Protocol". We have a forum section dedicated to advancing COVID healing through these protocols and much more:
https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?board=10.0

In other words, hundreds of thousands of hands-on doctors have been the peer reviewers of the science, of particularly early treatment of COVID-19.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2022, 01:37:52 PM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: This forum section regards THE applied SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment
« Reply #3 on: December 13, 2022, 09:42:30 AM »
« Last Edit: February 15, 2024, 11:42:37 AM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: This forum section regards THE applied SCIENCE of COVID-19 treatment
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2023, 03:48:15 PM »
bump
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/