Author Topic: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works  (Read 812 times)

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« on: May 05, 2021, 01:16:05 PM »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deu3GONgslk

Fear shuts down the part of our brain designed to solve problems.
Click here
So by censoring and removing the truth that has been around since March of 2020, of up to 99-100% effective - among the elderly and high-risk individuals - $20 remedies for COVID, they can maintain fear and control of American's minds by bumping to the fore the lies that remain advanced by profiteers in Big Pharma, Big Science, government bureaucracy and their cronies in the legacy media and internet "platforms" (publishers) while excluding the great news about the end of the pandemic in many countries of the world. Indeed in some poor African countries it never even began because of widespread use of hydroxychloroquine for malaria and/or ivermectin for parasites.
Once a person calculates the extremely low odds of dying from COVID, and then secures their treatment protocol with their doctor in case they do come down with COVID, it is very relaxing and any interest they may have had about becoming the subject of a drug trial and getting injected with an unapproved, experimental, biological agent simply melts away.

Simply click on the identical searches in two search engines and look at the thumbnails to decide which search engine is delivering the most relevant content to that search subject:
American inventors in Bing
https://www.bing.com/search?q=american+inventors&form=QBLH&sp=-1&ghc=1&pq=american+inventors&sc=8-18&qs=n&sk=&cvid=962EFAF4089A44C096C98686E6281C38

American inventors in Google
https://www.google.com/search?q=american+inventors&source=hp&ei=etj6YLu5J4jQtAXou7ngBw&iflsig=AINFCbYAAAAAYPrmihvwTH5yL37BhPFozwjiRh0c-xtK&oq=american+inventors&gs_lcp=Cgdnd3Mtd2l6EAwyAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAMgIIADICCC4yAggAMgIIADICCAAyAggAOggIABDqAhCPAVDIDlivWmCHngFoAnAAeACAAZQCiAGUApIBAzItMZgBAKABAqABAaoBB2d3cy13aXqwAQo&sclient=gws-wiz&ved=0ahUKEwi73tXNufnxAhUIKK0KHehdDnwQ4dUDCA0

[update 6-28-22] Google must be feeling the heat. A few months back all but one of the inventors in Google's thumbnails were black inventors with obscure inventions that few would have an interest in. Representing anything but search results that should result from demand for the most widely known and popular inventions and inventors, thereby horrifically wasting the user's time. [end edit]
_______________________________________________________________________

Project Veritas Google whistle blower video. If banned in the player below try BitChute:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/re9Xp6cdkro/

https://youtu.be/y9pIfGqo_Xo

Scroll to the 5:20 mark for beginning of the substantive discussion.

https://youtu.be/bl4XJQRbQso

Dump your Google infested "Google play" Android phone and consider Apple's IPhone privacy policies.

Now that the party Google elected through their censorship and search and auto-fill manipulation, is in complete control of government, there will be no end to the censorship including even censoring discussion of censorship. Harbor no doubt that censorship and the end of free speech along with our continuing foray into Orwellian "Newspeak", will be codified into U.S. law, going forward. Like in New York City where you can be fined $250,000 for using the term "illegal alien". Iceland may wind up being the last bastion of Internet free speech on earth - IF even they can hold out.

The light from the "shining city on the hill" has been extinguished and the descending darkness is accelerating. Nothing can slow it now. "You’ll Own Nothing and You’ll Be Happy"

https://youtu.be/AfjrpjqdQxI

[end edit addition 7-23-21]

[edit addition on 3-14-21: As we can see, the covid19 forum search below demonstrates we have been relegated unavailable in all of those search engines where we were generally page 1 result #2 on all of them including Google.
During February, a search for our newer site - covid treatment options - yielded nearly identical results of page 1 result #2 on all of the popular search engines except Google, where it again was not to be found. However by this writing it seems that website has also been cast into outer darkness by Google (which ultimately results in vanishing from all search engines).
Yet not one of those cowardly information assassins at Google logged in here to explain the reason they censored the truth of this forum, rendering it basically impossible for the public to find. https://www.covid-19forum.org/index.php?topic=782.0 - end edit]

[edit on 5-11-21: If you're thinking "well no wonder Google disappeared the site", I pussyfooted around like most of the other targets of censorship and avoided discussion of it, for fear of being censored and removed from search engines. It wasn't until after we were disappeared from Google and thus disappeared on all the rest of the search engines as a result, that I became more outspoken about their genocidal censorship that has resulted in the completely unnecessary deaths of over a half-million Americans and millions more worldwide. - end edit]

Why would anyone want to waste their time with the Google search engine where a bunch of mental midgets (or worse, regarding those that recognize the evil they are perpetrating) decide, what they will allow you to see and what they will not allow you to see, on the internet?
Yet because folks don't seem to give a hoot, Google's genocide continues.

As of 1-6-2021 a search of - covid19 forum - netted the following results:

In Yahoo it is page #1, #2 ranked. Adding the hyphen before 19 took it to #1:
https://search.yahoo.com/search?p=covid19+forum&fr=yfp-t&ei=UTF-8&fp=1

In Bing it is page #1, #2 ranked. Adding the hyphen took it to #1:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=covid19+forum&search=&form=QBLH

In Duckduckgo it is page #1, #2 ranked. Adding the hyphen took it to #1:
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=covid19+forum&t=h_&ia=web

[edit add 7-4-21] Try BraveSearch.com for another private search engine [end edit]

In Yippie it is page #1, #2 ranked. Adding the hyphen took it to #1:
https://yippy.com/search?query=covid19+forum

Doing the search in Google even with the hyphen, as of 1-6-2021, I only checked the first 10 pages, but it is pointless to pursue more, because it obviously won't be found:
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1120&bih=559&ei=u7z1X76VEoe1tgWJxLSYAg&q=covid-19+forum&oq=covid-19+forum&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQDFAAWABg7OIBaABwAngAgAEAiAEAkgEAmAEAqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwj-3sO4tofuAhWHmq0KHQkiDSMQ4dUDCAw

(That URL was copied and pasted just the same way it was from the other search engines. Are we supposed to presume there is nothing nefarious hiding in all those characters?)

Even when you put the entire address into Google, this forum is not a selection at least within the first 10 pages. [I noticed when updating on 6-11-21 that it is now returning results when using the full address]
https://www.google.com/search?biw=1120&bih=528&ei=Crz1X_LeG47GsAW776ToAg&q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.covid-19forum.org&oq=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.covid-19forum.org&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQDFAAWABgnrMEaABwAHgAgAEAiAEAkgEAmAEAqgEHZ3dzLXdpeg&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwjyi5rktYfuAhUOI6wKHbs3CS04WhDh1QMIDA

Other search engines like StartPage and Ask.com are little more than slaves of Google because they purchase Google's rankings. It's quite amazing that a company would voluntarily poison their search engine like that.

Boycotting Google is perhaps the easiest boycott in history. Simply switch to another search engine.
To go even further you can boycott companies that advertise in the sidebar ads on Google. After all their financing is what gives Google the power, to censor articles and youtube videos regarding effective early treatments for COVID-19, that resulted in the genocide of disproportionately hit minority communities as well as the elderly, sick and least able among us.
_____________________________________________

« Last Edit: January 29, 2023, 10:05:19 AM by admin »
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #1 on: October 07, 2021, 09:52:20 AM »
In cooperation with Google the Federal Government is monitoring Google searches.
12:35 mark:

https://youtu.be/XfeNCH9v-gk
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2022, 10:32:47 AM »
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/dr-robert-epstein-ramps-up-exposure-of-google-election-bias/

"Dr. Robert Epstein ramps up exposure of Google election bias
Epstein's researchers previously found that biased results generated by Google’s search algorithm likely impacted undecided voters in a way that gave at least 2.6 million votes to Hillary Clinton and as many as 10.4 million.

Wed Jul 7, 2021 - 8:02 am EDT

LifeSiteNews has been permanently banned on YouTube. Click HERE to sign up to receive emails when we add to our video library.

This story was originally published by the WND News Center

July 7, 2021 (WND News Center) – After finding that Google’s search-engine manipulation in the 2020 election could have shifted a minimum of 6 million votes to Democrat Joe Biden, Harvard-trained research psychologist and Democratic voter Robert Epstein turned his sites on the Georgia Senate elections.

For the first time — after having monitoring three national elections — he said in an interview with WND that his growing team of field agents found no political bias in Google’s search results.

But Epstein believes that’s a direct result of his monitoring efforts, and he plans to exponentially expand them.

“We went public in late October with monitoring, and it appears that we forced Google to back off on Georgia,” he told WND.

Epstein now is working on the establishment of a “permanent, large-scale monitoring system in all 50 states.” And he wants to have another system established by the end of this year to find out what the Big Tech companies “are showing our kids.”

“Next year, before the midterms, we would like to be building in as many states as possible the infrastructure for a large-scale permanent system,” he said, noting he is in conversation with potential funders.

It’s an expensive endeavor, but “the good news is we know how to do it,” said Epstein, a psychology professor at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology in Vista, California.

“That’s taken five years,” he said. “And we know it can have an impact on the content these companies are showing people.”

Meanwhile, Congress is not acting, said Epstein, with Democrats “in the pocket” of Big Tech and Republicans always hesitant to regulate business.

“So it’s a perfect storm here for perpetuating these irregularities,” he said.

Epstein opposes antitrust action, which often looks promising but turns out to be “just an example of regulatory capture,” meaning agencies acting in the interest of the business and not the public.

“It’s a classic mechanism by which large companies work with government agencies to craft laws, punishments and settlements that serve those companies,” he said.

“They will benefit the tech companies and not protect us.”

“These antitrust actions are about monopolies, protecting other businesses from being dominated by monopolies,” he said. “You could argue that consumers can benefit. But I don’t think any company can give us better search results.”

A better approach, he believes, is to make Big Tech bias a consumer-protection issue. But in Congress, “everyone moves where the money is.”

He said he asked a lawmaker why he had moved away from a consumer- protection approach to Big Tech.

“The answer was that he could get more support from colleagues by shifting to antitrust issues,” Epstein said. “What that comes down to is money.”

Epstein said he is creating a body of evidence that he hopes will bolster any action against the Big Tech giants.

“I think I turned a corner with these last elections. I think I have the evidence we need.”
Personal toll

Epstein, a registered Democrat who voted for Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden in the last two presidential elections, has paid a personal price for his work, which he sees as an effort to preserve free and fair elections and ultimately the republic itself.

Noting Google is “pervasive” in academia, he said a paper he recently submitted to a journal was rejected in a “very, very odd” process. Epstein, who pointed out he has been published in academic journals for 40 years and has been a reviewer himself, said one reviewer accepted his paper with only minor revisions. The other reviewer kept his or her identity secret, which he said he’s never seen in his entire career. That review recommended rejection, and the journal rejected the paper.

“I don’t think that’s allowed. I think it’s unethical. I’m protesting it loudly, but, of course, it raises some obvious questions,” he said.

“Was the secret review written by someone who receives financial support from Google?” he asked.

“Why would the journal editors take it seriously?” he said. “Do they have financial support from Google?”

He noted that in some cases he’s discovered that people writing negative reviews about his work are receiving support from Google.

WND asked Epstein about his January 2020 statements regarding the death of his wife, Misti Dawn Vaughn, in which he suggest it was not an accident.

He explained that after having given a private briefing in 2019 to state attorneys general, one of the AGs approached him and said, “I think, Dr. Epstein, that you are going to die in an accident in the next few months.”

It was a prediction, not a threat, Epstein clarified.

“Some of the data I had shared was very disturbing stuff, and if acted upon could be very problematic for Google and other companies.”

Epstein made it clear he is making no accusations, but he noted that not long after that warning, Misti died in an auto accident.

“That sequence was extremely disturbing,” he said, acknowledging that he and the people around him are “vulnerable.”

Invisible manipulation

Last month, Epstein gave a presentation of his work over the past five years to the annual meeting of the American Association of Behavioral and Social Sciences.

It was titled “Large-scale monitoring of Big Tech political manipulations in the 2020 Presidential election and 2021 Senate runoffs, and why monitoring is essential for democracy.”

He explained why he thinks the establishment of a permanent, large-scale monitoring system in all 50 states is essential.

“That is the only way to protect democracy, human autonomy and our descendents from invisible manipulation by Big Tech companies, now and in the decades to come,” he said in his presentation."
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #5 on: January 09, 2023, 02:34:22 PM »
When will people learn to switch to another search engine and stop supporting Google's homicidal Silicone Valley snowflake censors?

"Google pays nearly $392 million to settle sweeping location-tracking case
November 14, 20222:55 PM ET
Bobby Allyn

Google has agreed to pay nearly $392 million in a settlement with 40 states over allegations that the company tracked people through their devices after location tracking had been turned off, a coalition of state prosecutors announced on Monday.

Authorities said, since at least 2014, Google broke consumer protection laws by misleading users about when it secretly recorded their movements. It then offered the surreptitiously harvested data to digital marketers to sell advertisements, the source of nearly all of Google's revenue."
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2023, 09:23:44 AM »
https://www.wired.com/2012/06/opinion-google-is-evil/

"Google Is Evil
Rory O' Connor
Opinion
Jun 12, 2012

It's bad enough when you run a search company in an increasingly social world. It's worse when anti-trust regulators say you have unfairly and illegally used your dominance in search to promote your own products over those of competitors. Now Google executives, who like to boast of their company's informal motto, "Don't Be Evil," also stand accused of being just that -- and rightly so. What other interpretation is possible in light of persistent allegations that the internet titan deliberately engaged in “the single greatest breach in the history of privacy” and "one of the biggest violations of data protection laws that we had ever seen?”

[#contributor: /contributors/5932413644db296121d69eea]||||||

Google's history of anti-social social networks and anti-trust trust relations that deceptively breach online consumer privacy and trust has already begun to threaten its longstanding web hegemony and its vaunted brand. Now the company's repeatedly defensive and dishonest responses to charges that its specially equipped Street View cars surreptitiously collected private internet communications -- including emails, photographs, passwords, chat messages, and postings on websites and social networks -- could signal a tipping point.

With the phenomenally successful and profitable internet giant being newly scrutinized by consumers, competitors, regulators and elected officials alike, all concerned about basic issues of privacy, trust and anti-trust, the question must be raised: Is Google facing an existential threat? With government regulators nipping at its heels on both sides of the Atlantic, Facebook leading in the race for attention and prestige, and "social" beginning to replace "search" as a focus of online activity, the company that revolutionized our means of finding information just a decade ago now finds itself increasingly under siege and in danger of fading from prominence to become, in essence, the "next Microsoft."

Who gave these new media companies the right to invade our privacy without our permission or knowledge and then secretly store the data until they can figure out how to profit from it in the future?

That possibility came into sharper focus recently when fed-up European regulators gave the company an ultimatum -- change your lying ways about your anticompetitive practices in search, online advertising and smartphone software or face the consequences. Regulators in the United States are poised to follow suit.

Meanwhile, the secret Street View data collection has already led to inquiries in at least a dozen countries. Yet Google still refuses to 'fess up and supply an adequate explanation of what it was up to, why the data was collected and who knew about it. To date, no domestic regulator has even seen the information that Google gathered from American citizens. Instead, Google chose first to deny everything, then blamed a programming mistake involving experimental software, claimed that no use of the illicit data in Google products was foreseen, and said that a single "rogue" programmer was responsible for the whole imbroglio. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) determined instead that the data collection was no accident, that supervisors knew all about it and that Google in fact “intended to collect, store and review” the data “for possible use in other Google products,” and fined Google for obstructing the investigation.

Google's response to the FCC was not unusual. At every step of the way, the company has delayed, denied and obstructed investigations into its data collection. It has consistently resisted providing information to both European and American regulators and made them wait months for it -- as well as for answers as to why it was collected. Company executives even had the temerity to tell regulators they could not show them the collected data, because to do so might be breaking privacy and wiretapping laws! As Bradford L. Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, told The New York Times while citing Google's stated mission to "organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful," it seems "Google's practice is to prevent others from doing the same thing."

Given its record, and with so little accountability, how can any of us trust Google -- or other Internet giants like Facebook, which now faces its own privacy and anti-trust concerns? Who gave these new media companies the right to invade our privacy without our permission or knowledge and then secretly store the data until they can figure out how to profit from it in the future?

No one, obviously ... and as a direct result of their arrogant behavior, both Google and Facebook now face the possibility of eventual showdowns with regulators, the biggest to hit Silicon Valley since the US government went after Microsoft more than a decade ago. Their constant privacy controversies have also caused politicians to begin taking notice. Senator Al Franken of Minnesota, for example, who is in charge of a subcommittee on privacy, noted in a recent speech that companies such as Google and Facebook accumulated data on users because "it's their whole business model. And you are not their client; you are their product."

Small wonder that Google co-founder Larry Page is feeling "paranoid", as the Associated Press recently reported. Why? As I detail in my new book Friends, Followers and the Future: How Social Media are Changing Politics, Threatening Big Brands and Killing Traditional Media, as the new "contextual web" takes the place of the data-driven web of the early 21st century, it will mean further bad news for Google -- even though the company still sold $36.5 billion in advertising last year. Couple Google's paranoia about Facebook and the evident failure of its latest social network, Google Plus, with its problems about privacy, trust and anti-trust, and it's no surprise that executives are feeling paranoid. After all, they are facing the very real prospect of waging a defensive war on many fronts -- social, privacy, and trust -- simultaneously. Despite its incredible reach, power and profit, it's a war that Google -- the 21st century equivalent of the still-powerful but increasingly irrelevant Microsoft -- may well be destined to lose, along with the trust its users have long extended to one of the world's most powerful brands.

Editor: Caitlin Roper
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2023, 09:02:58 AM »
bump
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #8 on: May 09, 2023, 10:21:57 AM »
bump
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/

admin

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3077
Re: How Google's ownership of weak or lazy minds works
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2023, 09:24:05 AM »
bump
Over a million Americans have died completely unnecessary, horrific, deaths from COVID-19. Do you have a plan in place to help your family dodge the average $73,300 COVID hospital bill, through prevention and a $20 EARLY treatment protocol? https://www.covidtreatmentoptions.com/